Timeline for Is a statement and link to research of a problem considered off topic at RPI.SE?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/ with https://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 7, 2016 at 20:07 | history | edited | goldilocksMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 196 characters in body
|
| Aug 5, 2016 at 19:31 | comment | added | goldilocks Mod | I'll stand by what I've already said here, particularly the last two sentences. | |
| Aug 5, 2016 at 19:29 | comment | added | user50099 | @godilocks - (1) I have already replaced the power adapter. (2) others reported the radios have caused the problems. (3) the radios draw power. (4) Robillard clearly stated the background context and research was off-topic. I also think your analogy misses the mark considering points (2) and (3). Perhaps you can stay on-topic, and address the question at hand - is context and background information off-topic. | |
| Aug 5, 2016 at 14:53 | history | edited | goldilocksMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 111 characters in body
|
| Aug 5, 2016 at 13:38 | history | edited | goldilocksMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 134 characters in body
|
| Aug 5, 2016 at 13:32 | history | edited | goldilocksMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 134 characters in body
|
| Aug 5, 2016 at 13:27 | history | answered | goldilocksMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |