Timeline for Let's get critical: Mar 2015 Site Self-Evaluation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2015 at 2:40 | comment | added | RPiAwesomeness | @goldilocks This is true. We have a very good community that usually produces good answers - I wish I knew more so I could be more involved :P As you said, we overlap quite a bit. It makes us look quite a bit less impressive, but I think we still serve a useful purpose. Here's to the future of RPi.SE! :D Also. If you need my help with stuff (flagging, editing, and certain stuff to watch for - let me know. I'll do my best to help as possible with my limited privelidges! | |
| Mar 29, 2015 at 18:34 | comment | added | goldilocks Mod | ...E.g. raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/questions/27334/… <- Which got the worst score, is too broad and opinion oriented. But since there is at least an upvoted answer at this point it might as well remain open. | |
| Mar 29, 2015 at 18:33 | comment | added | goldilocks Mod | I was actually surprised at the quality of the Q&As (there's a backhanded compliment...) and the "self-evaluation" seems a bit harsh. I think in general we have a tough crowd to please, lol, or put another way, we lack "critical positive mass". It's also a tough niche, since we overlap so much with other more general S.E. sites (U&L, E.E., S.O.), and a lot of what's left over is often very hard to reproduce ("It should work but it doesn't, why?") and solve satisfactorily. Some of those questions should have been closed in the first place... | |
| Mar 26, 2015 at 19:13 | history | answered | RPiAwesomeness | CC BY-SA 3.0 |