Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 175 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Visit Stack Exchange
2 replaced http://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/ with https://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/
source | link

I was processing the edit review que, and I came across this suggested editthis suggested edit. I'm not entirely sure what to do in such a situation. The edit added some valuable information, but I'm hesitant to allow people to insert new things into another person's answer.

In this case it seems worthwhile, as it was valuable information. Other times though, the information could be incorrect, and may negatively impact the original poster (through no fault of their own). As a reviewers, our knowledge is not perfect, and we may not catch such errors.

I chose to 'skip' this review. How should such edits be treated in the future? A case by case basis, or a flat restriction on the practice? Personally, I prefer the later.

I was processing the edit review que, and I came across this suggested edit. I'm not entirely sure what to do in such a situation. The edit added some valuable information, but I'm hesitant to allow people to insert new things into another person's answer.

In this case it seems worthwhile, as it was valuable information. Other times though, the information could be incorrect, and may negatively impact the original poster (through no fault of their own). As a reviewers, our knowledge is not perfect, and we may not catch such errors.

I chose to 'skip' this review. How should such edits be treated in the future? A case by case basis, or a flat restriction on the practice? Personally, I prefer the later.

I was processing the edit review que, and I came across this suggested edit. I'm not entirely sure what to do in such a situation. The edit added some valuable information, but I'm hesitant to allow people to insert new things into another person's answer.

In this case it seems worthwhile, as it was valuable information. Other times though, the information could be incorrect, and may negatively impact the original poster (through no fault of their own). As a reviewers, our knowledge is not perfect, and we may not catch such errors.

I chose to 'skip' this review. How should such edits be treated in the future? A case by case basis, or a flat restriction on the practice? Personally, I prefer the later.

1
source | link

Edits that expand an answer

I was processing the edit review que, and I came across this suggested edit. I'm not entirely sure what to do in such a situation. The edit added some valuable information, but I'm hesitant to allow people to insert new things into another person's answer.

In this case it seems worthwhile, as it was valuable information. Other times though, the information could be incorrect, and may negatively impact the original poster (through no fault of their own). As a reviewers, our knowledge is not perfect, and we may not catch such errors.

I chose to 'skip' this review. How should such edits be treated in the future? A case by case basis, or a flat restriction on the practice? Personally, I prefer the later.